Inside Sweden's terrifying "no-go" zones (a photo essay)

[BillB]

More to follow, but let's start with the worst of the worst:

1) Skärholmen:

Loading Image...


As you can see, the police have lost all control of this shopping mall
in the center of Skärholmen, Stockholm, one of the 55 "no-go" zones
(lol) named in furkin's infamous "police report."

As you can see in the photo (not safe for young children!), three and
only three brave native Swedes are willing to face the immigrant Muslim
scourge head-on, as they walk defiantly through the Taliban-controlled
mega-mall.

The police would have broken up this protest for fear of imminent
beheadings, but they were afraid to go there. Remember, it's right in
the center of one of the famous 55 "no-go" zones, one which the Swedish
police publicly and officially ceded control to Islamists in an official
report.

It's true. Just ask furkin. He'll tell ya.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB
http://www.stageacademy.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Branded1.jpg
As you can see, the police have lost all control of this shopping mall
in the center of Skärholmen, Stockholm, one of the 55 "no-go" zones
(lol) named in furkin's infamous "police report."
As you can see in the photo (not safe for young children!), three and
only three brave native Swedes are willing to face the immigrant Muslim
scourge head-on, as they walk defiantly through the Taliban-controlled
mega-mall.
The police would have broken up this protest for fear of imminent
beheadings, but they were afraid to go there. Remember, it's right in
the center of one of the famous 55 "no-go" zones, one which the Swedish
police publicly and officially ceded control to Islamists in an official
report.
It's true. Just ask furkin. He'll tell ya.

WoO-WOo! - loowatch.com

[BillB]

Post by BillB
http://www.stageacademy.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Branded1.jpg
As you can see, the police have lost all control of this shopping mall
in the center of Skärholmen, Stockholm, one of the 55 "no-go" zones
(lol) named in furkin's infamous "police report."
As you can see in the photo (not safe for young children!), three and
only three brave native Swedes are willing to face the immigrant Muslim
scourge head-on, as they walk defiantly through the Taliban-controlled
mega-mall.
The police would have broken up this protest for fear of imminent
beheadings, but they were afraid to go there. Remember, it's right in
the center of one of the famous 55 "no-go" zones, one which the Swedish
police publicly and officially ceded control to Islamists in an official
report.
It's true. Just ask furkin. He'll tell ya.

2) Sollentuna

One of the other 55 violent "no-go" zones prominently featured in
furkin's infamous police report is Sollentuna. After a long day of jihad
and beheadings, triumphant Islamists like to grab a halal Subway
sandwich at Sollentuna Centrum:


Loading Image...

Someone tell those white people to get out of there!! Don't they know
it's a "no-go" zone??? Stupid Swedes.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by BillB
http://www.stageacademy.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Branded1.jpg
As you can see, the police have lost all control of this shopping mall
in the center of Skärholmen, Stockholm, one of the 55 "no-go" zones
(lol) named in furkin's infamous "police report."
As you can see in the photo (not safe for young children!), three and
only three brave native Swedes are willing to face the immigrant Muslim
scourge head-on, as they walk defiantly through the Taliban-controlled
mega-mall.
The police would have broken up this protest for fear of imminent
beheadings, but they were afraid to go there. Remember, it's right in
the center of one of the famous 55 "no-go" zones, one which the Swedish
police publicly and officially ceded control to Islamists in an official
report.
It's true. Just ask furkin. He'll tell ya.

2) Sollentuna
One of the other 55 violent "no-go" zones prominently featured in
furkin's infamous police report is Sollentuna. After a long day of jihad
and beheadings...

Wo0-Wo0! - loonwatch.com

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by BillB
http://www.stageacademy.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Branded1.jpg
As you can see, the police have lost all control of this shopping mall
in the center of Skärholmen, Stockholm, one of the 55 "no-go" zones
(lol) named in furkin's infamous "police report."
As you can see in the photo (not safe for young children!), three and
only three brave native Swedes are willing to face the immigrant Muslim
scourge head-on, as they walk defiantly through the Taliban-controlled
mega-mall.
The police would have broken up this protest for fear of imminent
beheadings, but they were afraid to go there. Remember, it's right in
the center of one of the famous 55 "no-go" zones, one which the Swedish
police publicly and officially ceded control to Islamists in an official
report.
It's true. Just ask furkin. He'll tell ya.

2) Sollentuna
One of the other 55 violent "no-go" zones prominently featured in
furkin's infamous police report is Sollentuna. After a long day of jihad
and beheadings...

Wo0-Wo0! - loonwatch.com

I'd say the real loon is someone who *HONESTLY believed*, simply because
he read it on several neo-Nazi websites, that the Swedish police called
these neighborhoods violent "no-go zones". LOL!!

That would be you, correct?

[da pickle]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by BillB
http://www.stageacademy.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Branded1.jpg
As you can see, the police have lost all control of this shopping mall
in the center of Skärholmen, Stockholm, one of the 55 "no-go" zones
(lol) named in furkin's infamous "police report."
As you can see in the photo (not safe for young children!), three and
only three brave native Swedes are willing to face the immigrant Muslim
scourge head-on, as they walk defiantly through the Taliban-controlled
mega-mall.
The police would have broken up this protest for fear of imminent
beheadings, but they were afraid to go there. Remember, it's right in
the center of one of the famous 55 "no-go" zones, one which the Swedish
police publicly and officially ceded control to Islamists in an official
report.
It's true. Just ask furkin. He'll tell ya.

2) Sollentuna
One of the other 55 violent "no-go" zones prominently featured in
furkin's infamous police report is Sollentuna. After a long day of jihad
and beheadings...

Wo0-Wo0! - loonwatch.com

Still no link

[BillB]

Post by da pickle
Still no link

Haven't you heard?? Furkin *finally* found the Swedish police report he
was relying on, but had admittedly never read and was misquoting.
Presumably, he used the simple instructions I graciously provided some
time earlier. He already gave you the link!

It only took him 40 hours to it figure it out, with a little help. Okay,
a lot of help, but he did it! Baby steps. He deserves our encouragement.
He's a bright kid in a short bus sort of way.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by da pickle
Still no link

Haven't you heard?? Furkin *finally* found the Swedish police report he
was relying on, but had admittedly never read

I never said I read the police report, you did.

And now that we know that the police report is about 30 pages long and written in Swedish.. we all know that was lie.

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by da pickle
Still no link

Haven't you heard?? Furkin *finally* found the Swedish police report he
was relying on, but had admittedly never read

I never said I read the police report, you did.

Um, that's what "admittedly never read" means, you furkin moron.

Post by fffurken
And now that we know that the police report is about 30 pages long and written in Swedish.. we all know that was lie.

What was a lie was your 55 violent "no-go zones". As I said, you are as
gullible as a small child.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by da pickle
Still no link

Haven't you heard?? Furkin *finally* found the Swedish police report he
was relying on, but had admittedly never read

I never said I read the police report, you did.

Um, that's what "admittedly never read" means, you furkin moron.

Post by fffurken
And now that we know that the police report is about 30 pages long and written in Swedish.. we all know that was lie.

What was a lie was your 55 violent "no-go zones". As I said, you are as
gullible as a small child.

You have a severe reading comprehension problem. The lie was your claim that you had read the police report.

With your translated into English quote that you provided, you did not in any way prove that the 55 "no go zones" are not Muslim or that they don't neatly fit when overlayed with a map of Sweden's Muslim ghettos.

And by the way, I think the Swedes, good progressives that they are, don't report crime or record crime statistics based on religion or ethnicity, as a matter of policy.

[Bea Foroni]

On Sunday, January 18, 2015 at 12:24:46 PM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:
as a small child.

Post by fffurken
You have a severe reading comprehension problem. The lie was your claim that you had read the police report.
With your translated into English quote that you provided, you did not in any way prove that the 55 "no go zones" are not Muslim or that they don't neatly fit when overlayed with a map of Sweden's Muslim ghettos.
And by the way, I think the Swedes, good progressives that they are, don't report crime or record crime statistics based on religion or ethnicity, as a matter of policy.

From FOX News, Saturday night:

"Over the course of this last week we have made some regrettable errors on air regarding the Muslim population in Europe - particularly with regard to England and France. This applies especially to discussions of so-called 'No Go Zones' areas where non-Muslims allegedly aren't allowed in and police supposedly won't go.

To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country... and no credible information to support the assertion that there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion. There are certainly areas of high crime in Europe as there are in the United States and other countries - where police and visitors enter with caution. We deeply regret the errors and apologize to any and all who may have taken offense including the people of France and England."


Holy shit! FOX News apologizes, you'd think F-f-firkin would, too.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB
as a small child.

Post by fffurken
You have a severe reading comprehension problem. The lie was your claim that you had read the police report.
With your translated into English quote that you provided, you did not in any way prove that the 55 "no go zones" are not Muslim or that they don't neatly fit when overlayed with a map of Sweden's Muslim ghettos.
And by the way, I think the Swedes, good progressives that they are, don't report crime or record crime statistics based on religion or ethnicity, as a matter of policy.

"Over the course of this last week we have made some regrettable errors on air regarding the Muslim population in Europe - particularly with regard to England and France. This applies especially to discussions of so-called 'No Go Zones' areas where non-Muslims allegedly aren't allowed in and police supposedly won't go.
To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country... and no credible information to support the assertion that there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion. There are certainly areas of high crime in Europe as there are in the United States and other countries - where police and visitors enter with caution. We deeply regret the errors and apologize to any and all who may have taken offense including the people of France and England."
Holy shit! FOX News apologizes, you'd think F-f-firkin would, too.

So there are no Muslim "no go areas" in Europe, is that what you're saying?

[da pickle]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
as a small child.

Post by fffurken
You have a severe reading comprehension problem. The lie was your claim that you had read the police report.
With your translated into English quote that you provided, you did not in any way prove that the 55 "no go zones" are not Muslim or that they don't neatly fit when overlayed with a map of Sweden's Muslim ghettos.
And by the way, I think the Swedes, good progressives that they are, don't report crime or record crime statistics based on religion or ethnicity, as a matter of policy.

"Over the course of this last week we have made some regrettable errors on air regarding the Muslim population in Europe - particularly with regard to England and France. This applies especially to discussions of so-called 'No Go Zones' areas where non-Muslims allegedly aren't allowed in and police supposedly won't go.
To be clear, there is no formal designation of these zones in either country... and no credible information to support the assertion that there are specific areas in these countries that exclude individuals based solely on their religion. There are certainly areas of high crime in Europe as there are in the United States and other countries - where police and visitors enter with caution. We deeply regret the errors and apologize to any and all who may have taken offense including the people of France and England."
Holy shit! FOX News apologizes, you'd think F-f-firkin would, too.

So there are no Muslim "no go areas" in Europe, is that what you're saying?

Bea is talking England and France ... BillB is talking Sweden and he
still is unable to provide the link.

I do not read Swedish and neither does he. If he had the link, he would
quit dodging.

[Bea Foroni]

Post by da pickle
Bea is talking England and France ... BillB is talking Sweden and he
still is unable to provide the link.
I do not read Swedish and neither does he. If he had the link, he would
quit dodging.

No good comes from stickin' the pickle... but, with Google translator, one can get a very good idea of what's being said. I keep up a correspondence with a friend who can not read English and I speak no Spanish. Google translation can do it.

[fffurken]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by da pickle
Bea is talking England and France ... BillB is talking Sweden and he
still is unable to provide the link.
I do not read Swedish and neither does he. If he had the link, he would
quit dodging.

No good comes from stickin' the pickle... but, with Google translator, one can get a very good idea of what's being said. I keep up a correspondence with a friend who can not read English and I speak no Spanish. Google translation can do it.

Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.

Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.

Billb is a desperate liar.

[BillB]

Post by fffurken
Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.

lol...what a furkin moron. You really don't get out much, do you?

I use Babylon, by the way.

Post by fffurken
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did

Yes, I did. How do you think I so quickly isolated the two sentences
that proved you are a gullible moron?

Post by fffurken
just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.

I didn't say I read it. You're lying again. You are actually recycling
lies. I've already exposed that one once.

You need to read a book to know that Sweden isn't spending 7% of GDP on
Muslim immigrants?? LOL! Apparently European teabaggers are economic
illiterates just like American ones!

Post by fffurken
Billb is a desperate liar.

haha...I haven't lied about anything. You've been exposed for one
blatant whopper after another.

You are way out of your league, furkin. You know it, I know it,
everybody knows it. It's pretty sad that being my bitch is worth it to
you, just to get some attention.

[Pepe Papon]

Post by BillB
You need to read a book to know that Sweden isn't spending 7% of GDP on
Muslim immigrants?? LOL! Apparently European teabaggers are economic
illiterates just like American ones!

The funny thing is that, while he's joined the right-wing
liberal-trashing bandwagon, he's actually a liberal himself. His
stated positions on almost all the topics that have been discussed on
RGP bas been the liberal one except for this anti-Muslim thing he's
become obsessed with.
--

Pepe Papon

[fffurken]

Post by Pepe Papon

Post by BillB
You need to read a book to know that Sweden isn't spending 7% of GDP on
Muslim immigrants?? LOL! Apparently European teabaggers are economic
illiterates just like American ones!

The funny thing is that, while he's joined the right-wing
liberal-trashing bandwagon

I don't trash liberals, I trash libtards, "liberals", (il)liberals, pseudo-liberals etc.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.

lol...what a furkin moron. You really don't get out much, do you?
I use Babylon, by the way.

Post by fffurken
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did

Yes, I did. How do you think I so quickly isolated the two sentences
that proved you are a gullible moron?

You proved NOTHING you deluded fool.

lol Post some more pictures of shopping malls.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.

lol...what a furkin moron. You really don't get out much, do you?
I use Babylon, by the way.

Post by fffurken
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did

Yes, I did. How do you think I so quickly isolated the two sentences
that proved you are a gullible moron?

Post by fffurken
just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.

I didn't say I read it. You're lying again. You are actually recycling
lies. I've already exposed that one once.
You need to read a book to know that Sweden isn't spending 7% of GDP on
Muslim immigrants??

You said that the original author never claimed that immigration was costing Sweden 7% of GDP. lol ANOTHER one of your lies!

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.

lol...what a furkin moron. You really don't get out much, do you?
I use Babylon, by the way.

Post by fffurken
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did

Yes, I did. How do you think I so quickly isolated the two sentences
that proved you are a gullible moron?

Post by fffurken
just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.

I didn't say I read it. You're lying again. You are actually recycling
lies. I've already exposed that one once.
You need to read a book to know that Sweden isn't spending 7% of GDP on
Muslim immigrants??

You said that the original author never claimed that immigration was costing Sweden 7% of GDP. lol ANOTHER one of your lies!

Oh, really? Show me where he said it. Show me the quote. LOLOL

You're all neo-Nazi hot air, furkin. You have NOTHING.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.

lol...what a furkin moron. You really don't get out much, do you?
I use Babylon, by the way.

Post by fffurken
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did

Yes, I did. How do you think I so quickly isolated the two sentences
that proved you are a gullible moron?

Post by fffurken
just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.

I didn't say I read it. You're lying again. You are actually recycling
lies. I've already exposed that one once.
You need to read a book to know that Sweden isn't spending 7% of GDP on
Muslim immigrants??

You said that the original author never claimed that immigration was costing Sweden 7% of GDP. lol ANOTHER one of your lies!

Oh, really? Show me where he said it. Show me the quote. LOLOL
You're all neo-Nazi hot air, furkin. You have NOTHING.

rofl!

[BillB]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
You said that the original author never claimed that immigration was costing Sweden 7% of GDP. lol ANOTHER one of your lies!

Oh, really? Show me where he said it. Show me the quote. LOLOL
You're all neo-Nazi hot air, furkin. You have NOTHING.

rofl!

Wow, great comeback!

Couldn't find the quote, eh?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
You said that the original author never claimed that immigration was costing Sweden 7% of GDP. lol ANOTHER one of your lies!

Oh, really? Show me where he said it. Show me the quote. LOLOL
You're all neo-Nazi hot air, furkin. You have NOTHING.

rofl!

Wow, great comeback!
Couldn't find the quote, eh?

I have the quote.

Why can't you find it?

[fffurken]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
You said that the original author never claimed that immigration was costing Sweden 7% of GDP. lol ANOTHER one of your lies!

Oh, really? Show me where he said it. Show me the quote. LOLOL
You're all neo-Nazi hot air, furkin. You have NOTHING.

rofl!

Wow, great comeback!
Couldn't find the quote, eh?

I have the quote.
Why can't you find it?

<crickets>

lol.. He must have found the quote himself. How could the dope forget something he wrote only a few days ago?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
Wow, great comeback!
Couldn't find the quote, eh?

I have the quote.
Why can't you find it?

<crickets>
lol.. He must have found the quote himself. How could the dope forget something he wrote only a few days ago?

I'm sorry, I've lost track of what we were talking about. Trying to
educate you is like trying to herd cats.

What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
economist Jan Tullberg, which supposedly says:

"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"

It's from the book where he:

"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."

Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true because that's what you read on the neo-Nazi website "Gates of
Vienna", correct?

I believe I already informed you at least twice that those quotes do not
exist.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
Wow, great comeback!
Couldn't find the quote, eh?

I have the quote.
Why can't you find it?

<crickets>
lol.. He must have found the quote himself. How could the dope forget something he wrote only a few days ago?

I'm sorry, I've lost track of what we were talking about. Trying to
educate you is like trying to herd cats.
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims and it doesn't matter if I think it's true or not.

Post by BillB
because that's what you read on the neo-Nazi website "Gates of
Vienna", correct?
I believe I already informed you at least twice that those quotes do not
exist.

What "quotes"? What are you babbling about?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??

You didn't start a thread titled:

"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?

You didn't state:

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."

You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?


Poor furkin.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

YOU claimed that it was never made by Jan Tullberg in his book. How do you know that?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

You stated:

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."

That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?

You also titled the post:

"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"

You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

lol *I'm* on the run? Too funny.

Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

lol *I'm* on the run? Too funny.
Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

Because I'm way fucking smarter than you.

The real question is why do you think he did? You're the one who made
the claims as fact. Why do you believe them to be true? Is it for ANY
other reason than "I read it on a neo-Nazi website"?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

lol *I'm* on the run? Too funny.
Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

Because I'm way fucking smarter than you.

rofl Finally! The true narcissist reveals himself.

You presented it as if it was fact, here is the quote;

"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

[fffurken]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

lol *I'm* on the run? Too funny.
Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

Because I'm way fucking smarter than you.

rofl Finally! The true narcissist reveals himself.
You presented it as if it was fact, here is the quote;
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

And by the way I would bet that Jan Tullberg DID in fact make the claim in his book but attacking a "far right Nazi" site is obviously a lot more appealing to you than a Swedish economist who might know what's he's talking about (unlike you).

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by fffurken
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

And by the way I would bet that Jan Tullberg DID in fact make the claim in his book but attacking a "far right Nazi" site is obviously a lot more appealing to you than a Swedish economist who might know what's he's talking about (unlike you).

Okay, now we're getting somewhere.

You are willing to bet something extraordinary is true, in the absence
of all other evidence, simply because you read it on a neo-Nazi website.
Is that accurate?

Now, assume I am wrong, and Jan Tullberg did make that astonishing claim
in his book (i.e. that he had measured Sweden's annual immigration costs
at 7% of GDP). Would you also bet THAT claim to be true, on that
evidence alone? Obviously you would, right? You stated it as fact in the
title of one of your threads.

In other words, if you were taking a university critical thinking test
on this whole scenario, you'd check the multiple choice answer that said:

C) "TRUE! TRUE! TRUE! No more information needed!"


I am sorry to inform you that you'd get an "F". F as in FFFurkin.

[risky biz]

Post by fffurken

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

lol *I'm* on the run? Too funny.
Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

Because I'm way fucking smarter than you.

rofl Finally! The true narcissist reveals himself.
You presented it as if it was fact, here is the quote;
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

And by the way I would bet that Jan Tullberg DID in fact make the claim in his book but attacking a "far right Nazi" site is obviously a lot more appealing to you than a Swedish economist who might know what's he's talking about (unlike you).

"And by the way I would bet that Jan Tullberg DID in fact make the claim in his book . ."

Sweet Jesus Christ- what a maroon.

[fffurken]

Post by risky biz

Post by fffurken

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
What quote am I looking for again? Is it the one from a book by Swedish
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
"measured the total economic cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP
some 250 billion Swedish Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
Those were your claims, right? And you are absolutely convinced they are
true

No, they're not my claims

What??
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"?
"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
You didn't get that information, which you restated as fact, from the
neo-Nazi website Gates of Vienna?
Poor furkin.

It's not MY claim.

"In 2014 Jan Tullberg, a researcher with a background from the Stockholm
School of Economics, published a book which measured the total economic
cost of immigration to Sweden at 7% of GDP some 250 billion Swedish
Kroner or EURO 26.88 billion per year."
That is YOUR claim. You wrote that, right?
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year"
You wrote that. Wherever you got it, you are endorsing it as a statement
of fact. You believe it to be true (or at least you did at the
time...now you're obviously on the run).

lol *I'm* on the run? Too funny.
Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

Because I'm way fucking smarter than you.

rofl Finally! The true narcissist reveals himself.
You presented it as if it was fact, here is the quote;
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

And by the way I would bet that Jan Tullberg DID in fact make the claim in his book but attacking a "far right Nazi" site is obviously a lot more appealing to you than a Swedish economist who might know what's he's talking about (unlike you).

"And by the way I would bet that Jan Tullberg DID in fact make the claim in his book . ."
Sweet Jesus Christ- what a maroon.

lol Prove he didn't.

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
Once again, how do you know Jan Tullberg never claimed it in his book?

Because I'm way fucking smarter than you.

rofl Finally! The true narcissist reveals himself.
You presented it as if it was fact, here is the quote;
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

Yes, I called bullshit on your idiotic claims. They were absurd.

In doing so, I exposed the fact that you can offer no reason whatsoever
for being convinced they are true, other than you read it on a neo-Nazi
website.

You believed what the neo-Nazis told you was in the police report, even
though it was absurd on its face, and you had never read the report
(couldn't FIND it, actually!).

You believed what the neo-Nazis told you was in a book, even though it
was absurd on its face, and you had never read the book (and probably
couldn't find it).

Do you see how all this reflects on your critical thinking skills? I'm
pretty sure everyone else does.

[BillB]

Post by BillB
You believed what the neo-Nazis told you was in a book, even though it
was absurd on its face, and you had never read the book (and probably
couldn't find it).

Sorry, I have to add to this. Not only did you believe (your
interpretation of) the neo-Nazi's absurd claims about what was in the
book (economist claims he measured Sweden spending 7% of GDP annually on
immigrants), you ALSO uncritically and absolutely believed it to be
true. That's much, much worse.

[Bea Foroni]

Post by BillB
Sorry, I have to add to this. Not only did you believe (your
interpretation of) the neo-Nazi's absurd claims about what was in the
book (economist claims he measured Sweden spending 7% of GDP annually on
immigrants), you ALSO uncritically and absolutely believed it to be
true. That's much, much worse.

And what if Sweden was spending 7% of GDP on immigrants? Maybe 7% is the right number, maybe it is a little more, or a little less. The farmer invests in seed, he takes a portion of his crop and reinvests it for the future. Without it, he has nothing for the future.

Canada knows it needs new blood to ensure a future. It tweaks the numbers, the mixture, the formula and studies the outcomes in order to predict the future. An investment in immigrants can be money well spent, and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.

[BillB]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by BillB
Sorry, I have to add to this. Not only did you believe (your
interpretation of) the neo-Nazi's absurd claims about what was in the
book (economist claims he measured Sweden spending 7% of GDP annually on
immigrants), you ALSO uncritically and absolutely believed it to be
true. That's much, much worse.

And what if Sweden was spending 7% of GDP on immigrants? Maybe 7% is

the right number, maybe it is a little more, or a little less. The
farmer invests in seed, he takes a portion of his crop and reinvests it
for the future. Without it, he has nothing for the future.

Post by Bea Foroni
Canada knows it needs new blood to ensure a future. It tweaks the

numbers, the mixture, the formula and studies the outcomes in order to
predict the future. An investment in immigrants can be money well spent,
and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.
What you're saying is true as far as it goes, you have to spend what you
have to spend to survive and thrive, but the amount claimed is WAY out
of proportion with reality. Sweden spends about that much on health care
for every man, woman and child in the entire country. Yet furkin is
eager to believe they spend the same amount on a relative handful of
immigrants, because he read it on a neo-Nazi website that openly
discusses Muslim genocide as a "final solution".

It's not really the absurd economic claims I'm examining, but furkin's
fascinating lack of all discernible critical thinking skills, and his
apparent comfort with that condition.

When legitimate economists attempt to make estimates on the
costs/benefits of immigration (which are notoriously inaccurate because
they rely on so many selective longterm assumptions), they do so on a
net basis. The "more or less" typically hovers around + or -0% of GDP,
not 7%.

[Bea Foroni]

An investment in immigrants can be money well spent,

Post by Bea Foroni
and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.
What you're saying is true as far as it goes, you have to spend what you
have to spend to survive and thrive, but the amount claimed is WAY out
of proportion with reality. Sweden spends about that much on health care
for every man, woman and child in the entire country.

I hate to split hairs with you, especially when we are discussing ffferkin's outrageous claims, but Sweden spends much more on healthcare.

According to the World Bank, Sweden spends 9.6% of GDP on healthcare (1/3 more than your estimate).

And while I'm there, I looked at Canada- a country that has more immigration (per capita) and found they spend more, 10.9%. Maybe all those immigrants are costing a bit more.

For kicks and giggles, I looked at USA's for profit, nothing beats competitive Capitalism, healthcare costs. A whooping 17.9%!!! Not only do we spend more as a percent of GDP, but having the highest GDP per capita, that means we spend waaay more per person.

Now, that wouldn't that bad (it is), if'n we had a longer lifespan. Or a lower child mortality. But we don't.

OK, I understand the world isn't perfect. And sure, the USA isn't perfect, but at least I'm being taken care off, right? Except recently I've had a medical problem, one that has me concerned. I make an appointment with my doctor, and they will see me right away- four weeks away! So I wait patiently, arrive early, and get seen in a timely manner (less than a hour wait). Doc prescribes some antibiotics and says, Might be cancer, you need to see a specialist.

Holy shit! I run home and make an appointment with the specialist. You'd think the doctor's office would have provided that service, but nooo... especially when they tried to double bill me. Anywho, the 'special' doctor will see me right away, in 5 1/2 weeks. Nearly forty days more of thinking, Cancer, cancer, cancer. Good outcome, not the big "C".

But holy crap! Nearly 3 months to get a diagnosis and an Rx for some pills. BTW, the pharmacist tech at WalMart (nice tattoos, lady)says, Oh... I took these pills too, drank some bad water. Except for the pills from Wally World, none of this has been cheap, even with health insurance.

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.TOTL.ZS

[BillB]

Post by Bea Foroni
I hate to split hairs with you, especially when we are discussing ffferkin's outrageous claims, but Sweden spends much more on healthcare.
According to the World Bank, Sweden spends 9.6% of GDP on healthcare (1/3 more than your estimate).

That's total spending. We're talking about government spending:

"Costs for health and medical care as a percentage of Sweden’s gross
domestic product (GDP) is fairly stable and on par with most other
European countries. In 2012, health and medical care represented 7.5 per
cent of GDP."

https://sweden.se/society/health-care-in-sweden/

[fffurken]

Post by Bea Foroni
An investment in immigrants can be money well spent,

Post by Bea Foroni
and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.
What you're saying is true as far as it goes, you have to spend what you
have to spend to survive and thrive, but the amount claimed is WAY out
of proportion with reality. Sweden spends about that much on health care
for every man, woman and child in the entire country.

I hate to split hairs with you, especially when we are discussing ffferkin's outrageous claims

It's not *my* claim and why is it outrageous, you don't have a fucking clue. It's from a book written by a Swedish economist and apparently his figure was higher than others because he included things that others haven't like the cost of crime.

Although it wasn't, this whole thing could have been done as an experiment - How to get libtards' heads to explode.

The far right neo-Nazi bigoted racist Muslim haters..and Swedish economists.. they're heeere! Arrrghhhh! lolol

[risky biz]

Post by fffurken

Post by Bea Foroni
An investment in immigrants can be money well spent,

Post by Bea Foroni
and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.
What you're saying is true as far as it goes, you have to spend what you
have to spend to survive and thrive, but the amount claimed is WAY out
of proportion with reality. Sweden spends about that much on health care
for every man, woman and child in the entire country.

I hate to split hairs with you, especially when we are discussing ffferkin's outrageous claims

It's not *my* claim and why is it outrageous, you don't have a fucking clue. It's from a book written by a Swedish economist and apparently his figure was higher than others because he included things that others haven't like the cost of crime.
Although it wasn't, this whole thing could have been done as an experiment - How to get libtards' heads to explode.
The far right neo-Nazi bigoted racist Muslim haters..and Swedish economists.. they're heeere! Arrrghhhh! lolol

Your squirming is laughable.

[risky biz]

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 11:56:04 AM UTC-8, fffurken wrote:

- It's not *my* claim and why is it outrageous, you don't have a fucking clue. It's from a book written by a Swedish economist and apparently his figure was higher than others because he included things that others haven't like the cost of crime.

"Apparently"? Is that another way of saying "I don't have a clue what's in this supposed book but this is what I want to be in this supposed book"?

[fffurken]

Post by risky biz
- It's not *my* claim and why is it outrageous, you don't have a fucking clue. It's from a book written by a Swedish economist and apparently his figure was higher than others because he included things that others haven't like the cost of crime.
"Apparently"? Is that another way of saying "I don't have a clue what's in this supposed book but this is what I want to be in this supposed book"?

I'm going by what I read, you're going on emotion. It cant be true, I don't WANT it to be! [stamps foot] lol

[BillB]

Post by fffurken
I'm going by what I read

Does it matter to you *where* you read it? Does that count for anything
in that little pea brain of yours? You just read things and believe
them? Do you ever weigh the common-sense likelihood of the claims
against the evidence offered to support that claim?

For example, did you find it strange that no quotes were offered??
Did that bother you at all?

Or, is a notorious Islamophobe's word (the very same guy who inspired
Anders Breivik to kill all those people in the 2011 Norway attacks) all
the proof you need?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
I'm going by what I read

Does it matter to you *where* you read it?

lol Good one.

Why can't you substantiate your claim -

"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

I'll tell you why, because you're a fucking liar!

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
I'm going by what I read

Does it matter to you *where* you read it?

lol Good one.
Why can't you substantiate your claim -
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."
I'll tell you why, because you're a fucking liar!

Because YOU are the person who made the original claim. I called
bullshit. The onus is on YOU to show he wrote what you claimed he wrote.

Of course I have the goods to destroy you again. Are you the last person
to figure that out?? I have a lengthy quote from the man himself,
demonstrating BEYOND ALL DOUBT that he didn't claim what you said he
did. But I think we all love seeing you squirm.

So, once again, WHY do you believe he wrote that? It is ONLY because you
read it on a neo-Nazi website? Is that why you believe all the things
you believe? Do you realize you're blindly taking the word of the guy
who inspired Anders Breivik to kill all those innocent people in Norway?
You knew that, right?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
I'm going by what I read

Does it matter to you *where* you read it?

lol Good one.
Why can't you substantiate your claim -
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."
I'll tell you why, because you're a fucking liar!

Because YOU are the person who made the original claim.

No, I didn't make the "original claim". I'll ignore it every time you say this from now on because you're too fucking stupid to argue with.

Post by BillB
So, once again, WHY do you believe he wrote that? It is ONLY because you
read it on a neo-Nazi website? Is that why you believe all the things
you believe? Do you realize you're blindly taking the word of the guy
who inspired Anders Breivik to kill all those innocent people in Norway?
You knew that, right?

OK, good, back to this. Who exactly are you claiming "inspired" Anders Breivik?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
I'm going by what I read

Does it matter to you *where* you read it?

lol Good one.
Why can't you substantiate your claim -
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."
I'll tell you why, because you're a fucking liar!

Because YOU are the person who made the original claim.

No, I didn't make the "original claim".

Yes, you did, and I've posted your quotes several times already. There
is no need to do it again. Everyone has seen them. You are in denial,
another sign of mental illness.

Post by fffurken
I'll ignore it every time you say this from now on because you're too fucking stupid to argue with.

No, you'll ignore it because you are in denial. I posted the quotes.

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
So, once again, WHY do you believe he wrote that? It is ONLY because you
read it on a neo-Nazi website? Is that why you believe all the things
you believe? Do you realize you're blindly taking the word of the guy
who inspired Anders Breivik to kill all those innocent people in Norway?
You knew that, right?

OK, good, back to this. Who exactly are you claiming "inspired" Anders Breivik?

Are you really this stupid?? Did you think the Gates of Vienna was a
credible news organization? LOL

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
I'm going by what I read

Does it matter to you *where* you read it?

lol Good one.
Why can't you substantiate your claim -
"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."
I'll tell you why, because you're a fucking liar!

Because YOU are the person who made the original claim.

No, I didn't make the "original claim".

Yes, you did, and I've posted your quotes several times already. There
is no need to do it again. Everyone has seen them. You are in denial,
another sign of mental illness.

Post by fffurken
I'll ignore it every time you say this from now on because you're too fucking stupid to argue with.

No, you'll ignore it because you are in denial. I posted the quotes.

Eh, "quotes of mine" that you posted I think were verbatim from the article.

Lord help you you're just not that bright.

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
So, once again, WHY do you believe he wrote that? It is ONLY because you
read it on a neo-Nazi website? Is that why you believe all the things
you believe? Do you realize you're blindly taking the word of the guy
who inspired Anders Breivik to kill all those innocent people in Norway?
You knew that, right?

OK, good, back to this. Who exactly are you claiming "inspired" Anders Breivik?

Are you really this stupid?? Did you think the Gates of Vienna was a
credible news organization? LOL

Who exactly are you claiming "inspired" Anders Breivik and what are you basing that on?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB
Or, is a notorious Islamophobe's word (the very same guy who inspired
Anders Breivik to kill all those people in the 2011 Norway attacks) all
the proof you need?

By the way, I missed this. I probably have a tendency to blank out anything an idiot says when they're using the term Islamphobe" or "Islamphobia" but please do expand.

Who exactly are you claiming inspired Anders Breivik?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
Or, is a notorious Islamophobe's word (the very same guy who inspired
Anders Breivik to kill all those people in the 2011 Norway attacks) all
the proof you need?

By the way, I missed this. I probably have a tendency to blank out anything an idiot says when they're using the term Islamphobe" or "Islamphobia" but please do expand.
Who exactly are you claiming inspired Anders Breivik?

Uh, the same person whose word you blindly accepted as proof of what the
Swedish economist wrote in his book. Am I not speaking plain English??

You *really* don't know or care where you get your "information" from,
do you.

Amazing. That's why you're a furkin moron.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
Or, is a notorious Islamophobe's word (the very same guy who inspired
Anders Breivik to kill all those people in the 2011 Norway attacks) all
the proof you need?

By the way, I missed this. I probably have a tendency to blank out anything an idiot says when they're using the term Islamphobe" or "Islamphobia" but please do expand.
Who exactly are you claiming inspired Anders Breivik?

Uh, the same person whose word you blindly accepted as proof of what the
Swedish economist wrote in his book. Am I not speaking plain English??

Please name the person and tell me what you base this on.

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
Or, is a notorious Islamophobe's word (the very same guy who inspired
Anders Breivik to kill all those people in the 2011 Norway attacks) all
the proof you need?

By the way, I missed this. I probably have a tendency to blank out anything an idiot says when they're using the term Islamphobe" or "Islamphobia" but please do expand.
Who exactly are you claiming inspired Anders Breivik?

Uh, the same person whose word you blindly accepted as proof of what the
Swedish economist wrote in his book. Am I not speaking plain English??

Please name the person and tell me what you base this on.

We're back to this?? I have to tell you who your own sources are?
LOLOLOL What a furkin moron.

Look at the name of the person whose word you blindly accepted about the
content of that book. Is that too difficult for your pea brain to
accomplish?

[BillB]

Post by fffurken
It's not *my* claim

Run, Forrest, Run!

"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year" --
furkin moron

He said it (in headlines), but he didn't claim it. lol

Rest assured, loyal readers, when *I* state something like that as a
matter of fact, I have examined all the evidence I feel I need under the
circumstances, weighed the credibility and bias of those putting forth
that evidence, and am convinced with at least 99.7% certainty that what
I say is true.

Furkin, not so much.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
It's not *my* claim

Run, Forrest, Run!
"Immigration now costing Sweden's taxpayers EURO 27 billion a year" --
furkin moron
He said it (in headlines), but he didn't claim it. lol
Rest assured, loyal readers, when *I* state something like that as a
matter of fact, I have examined all the evidence I feel I need under the
circumstances, weighed the credibility and bias of those putting forth
that evidence, and am convinced with at least 99.7% certainty that what
I say is true.
Furkin, not so much.

"By the way, your 7% of GDP claim is absurd, and the author cited never claimed that, or anything like that."

Billb, liar.

[fffurken]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by BillB
Sorry, I have to add to this. Not only did you believe (your
interpretation of) the neo-Nazi's absurd claims about what was in the
book (economist claims he measured Sweden spending 7% of GDP annually on
immigrants), you ALSO uncritically and absolutely believed it to be
true. That's much, much worse.

And what if Sweden was spending 7% of GDP on immigrants? Maybe 7% is the right number, maybe it is a little more, or a little less. The farmer invests in seed, he takes a portion of his crop and reinvests it for the future. Without it, he has nothing for the future.
Canada knows it needs new blood to ensure a future. It tweaks the numbers, the mixture, the formula and studies the outcomes in order to predict the future. An investment in immigrants can be money well spent, and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.

It's not "spending", it's costing.

Jesus, at least read the "far right Nazi" cite I linked in the other thread.

[risky biz]

Post by fffurken

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by BillB
Sorry, I have to add to this. Not only did you believe (your
interpretation of) the neo-Nazi's absurd claims about what was in the
book (economist claims he measured Sweden spending 7% of GDP annually on
immigrants), you ALSO uncritically and absolutely believed it to be
true. That's much, much worse.

And what if Sweden was spending 7% of GDP on immigrants? Maybe 7% is the right number, maybe it is a little more, or a little less. The farmer invests in seed, he takes a portion of his crop and reinvests it for the future. Without it, he has nothing for the future.
Canada knows it needs new blood to ensure a future. It tweaks the numbers, the mixture, the formula and studies the outcomes in order to predict the future. An investment in immigrants can be money well spent, and if it is 7% is the optimal amount, then that is what it is.

It's not "spending", it's costing.

- Jesus, at least read the "far right Nazi" cite I linked in the other thread.

LOL. "Why can't everyone read and believe the same stupid shit that I read and believe?"

[BTSinAustin]

Post by fffurken

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by da pickle
Bea is talking England and France ... BillB is talking Sweden and he
still is unable to provide the link.
I do not read Swedish and neither does he. If he had the link, he would
quit dodging.

No good comes from stickin' the pickle... but, with Google translator, one can get a very good idea of what's being said. I keep up a correspondence with a friend who can not read English and I speak no Spanish. Google translation can do it.

Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.
Billb is a desperate liar.

Copy the text from the PDF into Word, translate, see first sentence proves you wrong and then for grins, search the text for Muslim or Islam and get no results. Wow, hard!

[fffurken]

Post by BTSinAustin

Post by fffurken

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by da pickle
Bea is talking England and France ... BillB is talking Sweden and he
still is unable to provide the link.
I do not read Swedish and neither does he. If he had the link, he would
quit dodging.

No good comes from stickin' the pickle... but, with Google translator, one can get a very good idea of what's being said. I keep up a correspondence with a friend who can not read English and I speak no Spanish. Google translation can do it.

Google translating a url is quite straightforward not so sure about a pdf document.
Billb didn't read the 30 page Swedish police report as he claimed he did just as he didn't read the Swedish economists' book which he claimed never said that immigration was costing, *costing*, the Swedish taxpayer 27 billion a year.
Billb is a desperate liar.

Copy the text from the PDF into Word, translate, see first sentence proves you wrong and then for grins, search the text for Muslim or Islam and get no results. Wow, hard!

What pdf?

[BillB]

Post by BillB
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Sollentuna_Centrum_interi%C3%B6r_2.JPG

Note the active terrorist training facility on the upper floor. The
police would shut it down, but they can't -- no-go zone.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by BillB
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Sollentuna_Centrum_interi%C3%B6r_2.JPG

Note the active terrorist training facility on the upper floor. The
police would shut it down, but they can't -- no-go zone.

As long as it doesn't get as bad as this we should be OK..

http://tinyurl.com/q92eb8x

[Bea Foroni]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
Note the active terrorist training facility on the upper floor. The
police would shut it down, but they can't -- no-go zone.

As long as it doesn't get as bad as this we should be OK..
http://tinyurl.com/q92eb8x

Let's hope the Christians don't gain power like in Uganda:
Loading Image...

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by BillB
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Sollentuna_Centrum_interi%C3%B6r_2.JPG

Note the active terrorist training facility on the upper floor. The
police would shut it down, but they can't -- no-go zone.

As long as it doesn't get as bad as this we should be OK..
http://tinyurl.com/q92eb8x

Or this:

Loading Image...

or this,

Loading Image...

or this,

Loading Image...

Isn't anecdotal evidence a wonderful thing? Do you think all Irish
should be banned from Europe and North America? Might be a good idea,
just to be on the safe side.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB
Isn't anecdotal evidence a wonderful thing?

No.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by BillB
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2c/Sollentuna_Centrum_interi%C3%B6r_2.JPG

Note the active terrorist training facility on the upper floor. The
police would shut it down, but they can't -- no-go zone.

As long as it doesn't get as bad as this we should be OK..
http://tinyurl.com/q92eb8x

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01724/IRA1_1724326c.jpg
or this,
http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2012/Threats-Within/Homegrown-terrorism-photostory/files/2270.jpg
or this,
http://www.stepbystep.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Difference-Between-Al-Qaeda-and-IRA.jpg
Isn't anecdotal evidence a wonderful thing? Do you think all Irish
should be banned from Europe and North America? Might be a good idea,
just to be on the safe side.

And by the way, I didn't click on any of your links but looking at the text of them, what's your point about the IRA?

lol You're transforming into Reza Risky as we speak.

[BillB]

Post by fffurken
And by the way, I didn't click on any of your links but looking at the text of them, what's your point about the IRA?

You didn't look at the pictures, but you want to know their point? LOL.
Did it ever occur to you that looking might help?

I told you he was bright!

P.S. Of course you looked. I can smell the cognitive dissonance from
here. The feigned confusion about "the point" was a dead giveaway. lol

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken
And by the way, I didn't click on any of your links but looking at the text of them, what's your point about the IRA?

You didn't look at the pictures, but you want to know their point? LOL.
Did it ever occur to you that looking might help?
I told you he was bright!
P.S. Of course you looked. I can smell the cognitive dissonance from
here. The feigned confusion about "the point" was a dead giveaway. lol

I didn't look at any of your links about the IRA and your "cognitive dissonance" would still be imagined even if I did.

[BillB]

3. Taby

If there is one violent "no-go zone" featured in Furkin's infamous
Swedish police report that most clearly illustrates the tragedy of
violent Muslim immigration, it's Taby, a suburb of Stockholm. Just the
mention of the word Taby has been known to made the very bravest Swedish
policemen skit their byxor:

Loading Image...


No-go! No-go!

[fffurken]

Post by BillB
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

More "proof" of something, obviously...

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

More "proof" of something, obviously...

These are your no-go zones. I'm helping people understand that it's even
worse than YOU thought!

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

More "proof" of something, obviously...

These are your no-go zones. I'm helping people understand that it's even
worse than YOU thought!

You have pictures of shopping malls.

By all means, continue to make a clown of yourself although it's getting a little bit boring...

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

More "proof" of something, obviously...

These are your no-go zones. I'm helping people understand that it's even
worse than YOU thought!

You have pictures of shopping malls.
By all means, continue to make a clown of yourself although it's getting a little bit boring...

Not just shopping malls: Shopping malls in THE CENTER of your violent
no-go zones!!

It sort of begs the question: If the police are afraid to go into these
"zones", why aren't all the white Swedish shoppers?

Do you think there is ANYONE left reading this who doesn't realize you
are a gullible fool?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

More "proof" of something, obviously...

These are your no-go zones. I'm helping people understand that it's even
worse than YOU thought!

You have pictures of shopping malls.
By all means, continue to make a clown of yourself although it's getting a little bit boring...

Not just shopping malls: Shopping malls in THE CENTER of your violent
no-go zones!!

WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

[Bea Foroni]

Post by fffurken
WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

Why do you keep linking to this page? It is a news page that disproves all your hatred. It's just plain weird you keep linking to it.

[fffurken]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by fffurken
WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

Why do you keep linking to this page? It is a news page that disproves all your hatred. It's just plain weird you keep linking to it.

lol I've already explained what loonwatch.com is but you'll never understand because its propaganda is aimed at you.

The reason I keep on linking it though is because when libtards aren't calling sane and intelligent people racists in an attempt to stifle debate, they often call them fearmongerers or lunatics.

And I find it funny when same libtards as a counter argument write complete fantasy that none of us have ever suggested is the case.

Libtards are profoundly dishonest people as well as being utterly and cluelessly stupid.

[Bea Foroni]

Post by fffurken
The reason I keep on linking it though is because when libtards aren't calling sane and intelligent people racists in an attempt to stifle debate, they often call them fearmongerers or lunatics.
And I find it funny when same libtards as a counter argument write complete fantasy that none of us have ever suggested is the case.
Libtards are profoundly dishonest people as well as being utterly and cluelessly stupid.

I didn't know about this website until you linked it. It puts up good arguments for everything you say. Everything!

There is an article about French "no-go zones". It just plain shows there is no such thing. Well written articles that show how wrong you are. Its like trying to sell me a Ford by showing me Chevy commercials.

[fffurken]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by fffurken
The reason I keep on linking it though is because when libtards aren't calling sane and intelligent people racists in an attempt to stifle debate, they often call them fearmongerers or lunatics.
And I find it funny when same libtards as a counter argument write complete fantasy that none of us have ever suggested is the case.
Libtards are profoundly dishonest people as well as being utterly and cluelessly stupid.

I didn't know about this website until you linked it.

I didn't know anything about loonwatch.com either until Clave cited it with the claim that 94% of the world's terrorists are NOT Muslim.

And of course, as I already explained, and after only a brief look at it, the 94% figure was a decades long historical account of "terrorist" acts on US soil.

You people will uncritically swallow any old shite if it supports your world view.

[Clave]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by fffurken
WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

Why do you keep linking to this page? It is a news page that disproves all
your hatred. It's just plain weird you keep linking to it.

Short answer: he's an idiot.

[fffurken]

Post by Clave

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by fffurken
WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

Why do you keep linking to this page? It is a news page that disproves all
your hatred. It's just plain weird you keep linking to it.

Short answer: he's an idiot.

And here's another one...

[BillB]

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by fffurken
WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

Why do you keep linking to this page? It is a news page that disproves all your hatred. It's just plain weird you keep linking to it.

haha...from the "about" page:

The folks featured on Loonwatch fit two or more of the following
definitions:

Loon noun

1. a worthless lazy fellow
2. a person with confused ideas; incapable of serious thought [syn:
addle-head]
3. large somewhat primitive fish-eating diving bird of the northern
hemisphere having webbed feet placed far back; related to the grebes

Source: WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.


You couldn't come up with a better description of furkin if you tried!

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by Bea Foroni

Post by fffurken
WOO-W00! - loonwatch.com

Why do you keep linking to this page? It is a news page that disproves all your hatred. It's just plain weird you keep linking to it.

The folks featured on Loonwatch fit two or more of the following
Loon noun
1. a worthless lazy fellow
addle-head]
3. large somewhat primitive fish-eating diving bird of the northern
hemisphere having webbed feet placed far back; related to the grebes
Source: WordNet® 3.0, © 2006 by Princeton University.
You couldn't come up with a better description of furkin if you tried!

Yes, a central theme of the Muslim propaganda cite that is loonwatch.com is ad hominem of people who tell the truth. And this is extremely appealing to libtards.

[BillB]

Post by BillB
3. Taby
If there is one violent "no-go zone" featured in Furkin's infamous
Swedish police report that most clearly illustrates the tragedy of
violent Muslim immigration, it's Taby, a suburb of Stockholm. Just the
mention of the word Taby has been known to made the very bravest Swedish
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg
No-go! No-go!

Loading Image...

Note all the terrorist assault vehicles in the parking lot, and the
halal McDonald's in the background. Tragic.

[David Monaghan]

Post by BillB
3. Taby
If there is one violent "no-go zone" featured in Furkin's infamous
Swedish police report that most clearly illustrates the tragedy of
violent Muslim immigration, it's Taby, a suburb of Stockholm. Just the
mention of the word Taby has been known to made the very bravest Swedish
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.

DaveM

[fffurken]

Post by David Monaghan

Post by BillB
3. Taby
If there is one violent "no-go zone" featured in Furkin's infamous
Swedish police report that most clearly illustrates the tragedy of
violent Muslim immigration, it's Taby, a suburb of Stockholm. Just the
mention of the word Taby has been known to made the very bravest Swedish
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.

lol I know. I didn't even bother mentioning that but I do think it adds to Billb's clownishness.

Poor guy's falling apart at the seams.

[risky biz]

Post by fffurken

Post by David Monaghan

Post by BillB
3. Taby
If there is one violent "no-go zone" featured in Furkin's infamous
Swedish police report that most clearly illustrates the tragedy of
violent Muslim immigration, it's Taby, a suburb of Stockholm. Just the
mention of the word Taby has been known to made the very bravest Swedish
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.

lol I know. I didn't even bother mentioning that but I do think it adds to Billb's clownishness.
Poor guy's falling apart at the seams.

Seriously, 'furkon'- you must be realizing by now that almost everyone here sees you as nothing more than an ignorant, hate-mongering nincompoop. There is plenty to criticize about the Muslim religion. You just haven't come up with anything. Everything you've ever said on RGP about Muslims has been about 97% lies. If anything, your personal project to influence others to hate Muslims has done the reverse. Because of you people who knew alomost nothing about Muslims know more now and it's a lot different from what you wanted them to think. It's just hilarious to watch you repeatedly shoot your self in the foot and then declare what a marksman you are. Your "this isn't really happening, what I said is highly credible" act is threadbare. Pretending that other people said things that they didn't say isn't going to salvage your personal train wreck.

[fffurken]

Post by risky biz

Post by fffurken

Post by David Monaghan

Post by BillB
3. Taby
If there is one violent "no-go zone" featured in Furkin's infamous
Swedish police report that most clearly illustrates the tragedy of
violent Muslim immigration, it's Taby, a suburb of Stockholm. Just the
mention of the word Taby has been known to made the very bravest Swedish
http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.

lol I know. I didn't even bother mentioning that but I do think it adds to Billb's clownishness.
Poor guy's falling apart at the seams.

Seriously, 'furkon'- you must be realizing by now that almost everyone here sees you as nothing more than an ignorant, hate-mongering nincompoop. There is plenty to criticize about the Muslim religion. You just haven't come up with anything. Everything you've ever said on RGP about Muslims has been about 97% lies. If anything, your personal project to influence others to hate Muslims has done the reverse. Because of you people who knew alomost nothing about Muslims know more now and it's a lot different from what you wanted them to think. It's just hilarious to watch you repeatedly shoot your self in the foot and then declare what a marksman you are. Your "this isn't really happening, what I said is highly credible" act is threadbare. Pretending that other people said things that they didn't say isn't going to salvage your personal train wreck.

http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

"Proof"! rofl

[BillB]

On 19/01/2015 2:10 AM, fffurken wrote:> http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder

/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

Post by fffurken
"Proof"! rofl

Yup, everyone can see that's a violent "no-go zone" even the toughest
policeman would be terrified to enter!! LOL

What a bozo. You just can't admit that you've been duped by your
neo-Nazi friends, can you?

[fffurken]

Post by BillB
On 19/01/2015 2:10 AM, fffurken wrote:> http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder
/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

Post by fffurken
"Proof"! rofl

Yup, everyone can see that's a violent "no-go zone" even the toughest
policeman would be terrified to enter!! LOL
What a bozo. You just can't admit that you've been duped by your
neo-Nazi friends, can you?

lol God knows what you think a "no go area" is you fantastical libtwerp.

[BillB]

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
On 19/01/2015 2:10 AM, fffurken wrote:> http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder
/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

Post by fffurken
"Proof"! rofl

Yup, everyone can see that's a violent "no-go zone" even the toughest
policeman would be terrified to enter!! LOL
What a bozo. You just can't admit that you've been duped by your
neo-Nazi friends, can you?

lol God knows what you think a "no go area" is you fantastical libtwerp.

According to the video YOU posted defining the term, it's an "area in
which police have admitted to have surrendered total control of to
predominantly Muslim criminal gangs."

LOLOL!!!

Furkin, you are the dumbest and most gullible RGPer to have ever graced
these pages. You're absolutely hilarious.

[fffurken]

Post by BillB

Post by fffurken

Post by BillB
On 19/01/2015 2:10 AM, fffurken wrote:> http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder
/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

Post by fffurken
"Proof"! rofl

Yup, everyone can see that's a violent "no-go zone" even the toughest
policeman would be terrified to enter!! LOL
What a bozo. You just can't admit that you've been duped by your
neo-Nazi friends, can you?

lol God knows what you think a "no go area" is you fantastical libtwerp.

According to the video YOU posted defining the term, it's an "area in
which police have admitted to have surrendered total control of to
predominantly Muslim criminal gangs."
LOLOL!!!
Furkin, you are the dumbest and most gullible RGPer to have ever graced
these pages. You're absolutely hilarious.

But the pictures of shopping malls with no jihadists in sight!

[risky biz]

Post by BillB
On 19/01/2015 2:10 AM, fffurken wrote:> http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder
/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

Post by fffurken
"Proof"! rofl

Yup, everyone can see that's a violent "no-go zone" even the toughest
policeman would be terrified to enter!! LOL
What a bozo. You just can't admit that you've been duped by your
neo-Nazi friends, can you?

- lol God knows what you think a "no go area" is you fantastical libtwerp.

Stop squirming furiously and just disappear for a while, 'furkon'. You can come back later and post the same lies all over again. That's what the dumbasses here do and they're, apparently, smarter than you. You're looking so pathetic here that even I am starting to feel pity for you.

[BillB]

Post by David Monaghan
No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.
DaveM

I think it's a marketing picture for the mall. Call it an artist's
rendition. Are you questioning his artistic integrity? Do you think all
those Swedes should be Muslim guerrilla fighters?

Loading Image...

Quite a few people there, considering it's the center of a violent no-go
zone.

[Pepe Papon]

Post by BillB

Post by David Monaghan
No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.
DaveM

I think it's a marketing picture for the mall. Call it an artist's
rendition. Are you questioning his artistic integrity? Do you think all
those Swedes should be Muslim guerrilla fighters?
http://cdn.array.se/files/2012/08/tabycentrum.png
Quite a few people there, considering it's the center of a violent no-go
zone.

If it's an artist's rendition, they did a helluva job making it look
like a real photo, complete with blurry action shots of people walking
on the periphery.
--

Pepe Papon

[BillB]

Post by Pepe Papon

Post by BillB

Post by David Monaghan
No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.
DaveM

I think it's a marketing picture for the mall. Call it an artist's
rendition. Are you questioning his artistic integrity? Do you think all
those Swedes should be Muslim guerrilla fighters?
http://cdn.array.se/files/2012/08/tabycentrum.png
Quite a few people there, considering it's the center of a violent no-go
zone.

If it's an artist's rendition, they did a helluva job making it look
like a real photo, complete with blurry action shots of people walking
on the periphery.
--
Pepe Papon

Photo or no photo, we all know the anonymous internet chickenshit
"furkin" would be terrified to go there because it's smack dab in the
center of one of Sweden's infamous "no-go" zones, where Swedish police
publicly ceded control to militant Islamists and violent mall walkers in
its now-famous police report.

The real question is if mo_ron would scurry across the street if he saw
a mall like that. I really don't think so. I'm starting to think mo_ron
is braver than furkin!!

[BillB]

Post by Pepe Papon

Post by BillB

Post by David Monaghan
No idea what any of this is about, but that's pretty clearly an architect's
vision of what the place would look like, not an actual picture.
DaveM

I think it's a marketing picture for the mall. Call it an artist's
rendition. Are you questioning his artistic integrity? Do you think all
those Swedes should be Muslim guerrilla fighters?
http://cdn.array.se/files/2012/08/tabycentrum.png
Quite a few people there, considering it's the center of a violent no-go
zone.

If it's an artist's rendition, they did a helluva job making it look
like a real photo, complete with blurry action shots of people walking
on the periphery.
--
Pepe Papon

Oh, I see the confusion. Dave was talking about the *first* picture I
posted of Taby. I thought it was some kind of artistically enhanced
marketing photo from the mall's website.

I just posted that picture over a photo of the mall (like I did with the
other "no-go zone" malls) because I thought it was interesting in that
it provided a bold contrast between how furkin pictures the Swedish
environment, and how the Swedes picture it. It ties into what I was
saying about Swedes laughing their asses off at the ignorant
furkin-neo-Nazi-types over on reddit. The difference, obviously, is that
they're actually there, living it, and furkin is hiding under his bed in
his mom's basement 2000km away, with his ipad and his neo-Nazi websites
telling him what to believe.

[dsm]

..of how furkin pictures the Swedish environment, and how the Swedes picture it.

Holy shit, it's whiter than a Tea Party convention! The artist's rendition of "The Ideal" for Täby Sweden.

http://www.webbkameror.se/bilder/Taby_Centrum_3.jpg

(one quadroon noted in the stroller)